One would have thought that maybe death of baba gurbachan singh(head of nirankaris) would douse the flames.But people were in for a rude shock.Bhindranwale,tasting the blood became still stronger,making simply outrageous statements almost on daily basis(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD32pV28Guc&feature=related)........this particular video shows him making comments after slaying lala jagat narain(of punjab kesri group),,,,and what was his fault u would ask?????He wrote some story on sikh gurus,that they used to live like princes and he dared to call akalis and bhindranwale terrorists and traitors.
Now regarding guru saheban,is it an insult to call them princes????was he propagating hatred towards sikhs>>>no.was he making any outrageous statements not previously known.>>>no,so where is the question of him being sacrilegous????Yes regarding the bold stance he took,he dared to challenge the autocracy of bhindranwale and gang.
To prove my point let me ask u a very simple question.If any state,take the example of kashmir,wants autonomy .....wants to function independent of india today what would u say????Yes the first thing that would come to mind is TRAITORS,ANTI NATIONAL and so on........the very same thing may have come to lala's mind when bhindranwale and akalis were shouting for autonomy.True lala may have exceeded his limits,we are no one to raise fingers on guru sahib,But there is a freedom of speech that has to be maintained and he said nothing out of the books.Anyhow people found those comments offensive and lala was shot dead in 1981.***cont***
No comments:
Post a Comment